These great attorneys took care of all the legal representation and did a phenomenal job. I would recommend them to anyone seeking excellent attorneys!

-C. Mossier
Mother of a Wrongful Death Victim

Midland Motorcycle Accident Lawyer

Midland Motorcycle Accident Lawyer, Michael Grossman, Explains the Legal Rights When a Biker Is In a Crash

Because Texas has more than half a million motorcycle licensees, accidents involving these particular riding machines probably will happen. No place is exempt from these bike riders, whether it is on a city street, a highway, or a country road, motorcycles and the people who ride them are all over the place.

Do you have a legal question?
Enter your phone number below and let's talk.
--

The reasons why motorcycle accidents happen are countless. From the kickstand becoming dislodged from its safety position and suddenly or gradually dropping downward and, consequently, flipping the bike and its driver to some foreign object lying in the roadway that the motorcyclist does not see in time to automobile drivers not being focused on their surroundings only to see the bike and driver at the very last minute when it is too late to avoid contact. If you or someone you know or love has been injured in a motorcycle accident, you have legal rights that entitle you to seek justice by filing a legal claim for financial reimbursement.


Drunk Driving Motorcycle Accidents in Midland

If the driver of any type motorized and licensed vehicle is drunk, and has an accident, it makes no difference whether the driver is a motorcyclist, drives a passenger vehicle, or drives a truck, etc., one would almost automatically assume that the person solely responsible for the accident is the drunk driver. However, circumstances have shown over and over that this may not be the open and shut case it appears to be.

The great State of Texas has what is referred to as the Texas Dram Shop Law. This law helps protect the public by making not only the drunk driver responsible for his or her actions, but it also holds certain individuals responsible for the drunk driver’s actions as well. It is to be expected that if a drunk motorcyclist causes injury to another person or persons, he or she can be held legally responsible for these actions. But under the Texas Dram Shop Law the responsibility is even more far-reaching. If a drunk motorcyclist causes injury to him or herself and to another person and/or property, not only can the inebriated motorcyclist be held liable, but others as well. If the motorcyclist had recently left a restaurant that served him or her alcohol and it could be proved that the bike rider was drunk prior to leaving the establishment, the beverage server and the owner of the restaurant owner could be jointly and severally liable of serving too much alcohol to the patron. The same goes for a tavern owner or the proprietor of a bar should either of them knowingly over served alcohol to a customer who clearly shows signs of already have too much to drink. The Texas Dram Shop Law even goes one step further in an effort to hold those individuals responsible for drunken driving accidents. The liquor store owner or their employee(s) can also be brought into accountability when it might appear to be a matter of simple greed in just getting that almighty dollar from the customer without regards to public safety. If a customer attempts to purchase alcohol from a liquor store and the store owner or an employee of the liquor store owner chooses to disregard the fact that the customer is visibly inebriated and the employee negligently proceeds with the sale, one or both of the liquor store parties or individuals could be held liable for the ensuing vehicle accident and damages sustained.

The injured third party victim in the drunken driving accident can file a lawsuit charging not only the drunk motorcyclist with liability, in addition to the restaurant or tavern owner and/or their waiter(s) or the liquor store owner and/or their employee(s) as well. If an unfortunate death occurred, family members have the right to file a lawsuit charging those same individuals with Wrongful Death.

However, the theory of ‘over-serving’ alcohol to an already tipsy individual is easy to assume, but not so easy to prove. To prove this cause of action, only retaining the services of a well-seasoned and successful courtroom attorney should even be considered. The Midland drunk driving accident attorneys at Grossman Law Offices will step up to your defense with twenty (20) years of litigation experience behind them. Attorney Michael Grossman and associates have successfully defended case after case for their clients using the Texas Dram Shop Law to bring those responsible to legal and financial accountability.


Motorcycle Accidents vs. Car Wrecks

The very design of the typical motorcycle and its two or three-wheel design with no protective surrounding framework, as compared to that of an automobile, makes the driver an almost certain recipient of massive body trauma should an accident occur. So it goes without saying that accidents involving motorcyclists and passenger vehicles almost always end with very serious injuries to the motorcyclists if not death. By comparison, the very design of a typical passenger vehicle with its protective surrounding framework does give the driver considerably more protection. Consequently, riders or the driver of a passenger vehicle can be expected to have far less serious injuries than that of a bike rider or driver.

Do you have a legal question?
Enter your phone number below and let's talk.
--

Because of the structural difference in an automobile and motorcycle, collisions between the two have just cause to be handled differently. In everyday-type accidents where both drivers have passenger vehicles, quite often no legal consultation or legal representative is needed or necessary. It is a simple matter of drivers exchanging driver license information, driver’s tag numbers, and exchanging information about each driver’s insurance provider. However, with the structural differences of the motorcycle and the passenger vehicle, odds are there is going to be extensive property damage and extensive personal injury to the motorcyclist than to the passenger vehicle or the passenger vehicle’s driver. With this scenario in mind, it is advisable that only a competent legal and experienced attorney be retained as soon as possible.

Although there is no law against it, it is suggested that under no circumstances should a novice or inexperienced individual attempt to legally represent him or herself in such a case. Some defense attorneys will use tricks and attempt to play mind games with seasoned prosecutors. When the defense attorney discovers a novice is representing him or herself, the novice almost never gets the judgment in what should have otherwise been a very satisfactory financial recovery had the claimant considered choosing an attorney with a reputation of successful ‘wins’. Grossman Law Offices have such a reputation for being prepared in the courtroom, of staying the course in defense of their clients interests, and the result has been win after win. Grossman and associates also have noted successes in out-of-court negotiated settlements and their reputation precedes them.


Midland Motorcycle Injury Accidents

Personal injuries resulting in motorcycle accidents can be very serious to say the least. More often than not, personal injuries resulting in a motorcycle accident are fatal. One such injury that begins as being more painful than anything else is that of road rash of road burn. Road rash also called road burn occurs when the driver has lost control of the bike and bike and driver go down to the pavement. The driver is often entangled with the bike as both slide along the pavement and the driver’s skin comes into contact with the pavement also. Bleeding cuts, abrasions, scrapes, scratches, and sometimes torn skin is the result. Should these injuries not get immediate medical attention, over time infection becomes a serious problem and the victim might have lost that window of opportunity to legally address these damages in reference to financial recovery.

Road rash/road burn is an initial minor concern that could turn very serious, but in addition to this type injury, there are injuries that are way more serious in the aftermath of a motorcycle-related collision. Broken bones, neck, back, and hip injuries, fractures, internal damage to include spinal injuries, amputation of limbs as the force of the body makes contact with pavement and is relentlessly drug, paralysis, brain injuries, and decapitation has been known to happen in some instances. In addition to trauma to the body, the loss of a steady paycheck due to injuries and rehabilitation and, quite possibly, never being able to return to work, and the outlay of out-of-pocket expenses can be mind-boggling. According to Midland Law, a motorcyclist who suffers personal injury has the legal right to sue for damages to seek financial reimbursement to include out-of-pocket expenses, prostheses, and reconstructive surgery and on-going medical attention which cansometimes be for life.


Fatal Motorcycle Accidents in Midland

According to Texas Department of Transportation statistics, there is at least one fatal motorcycle accident every day on the streets, by-ways, or highways of Texas. The law is specific in outlining who may sue for what. Family members who have lost a loved one in a motorcycle-related fatality may all sue for Wrongful Death damages but only one surviving family member of a motorcycle-related fatality may sue for survival benefits due to the negligence of others. Unless those family members retain the services of a competent attorney who is very knowledgeable in the area of motorcycle accidents and who has a winning track record of courtroom ‘wins’, the various legal rights that should be pursued may not get addressed.

The Midland motorcycle drunk driving attorneys of Grossman Law Offices have over twenty (20) years of litigation experience and successful ‘wins’ in courtroom judgments and in out-of-court negotiated settlements. In addition to Grossman and his noted associates, Grossman’s skilled team of investigators will not stop until they have uncovered and discovered every truth as it relates to defending the client. The overall theme or motto of both the Grossman litigation team and the investigative team seems to be “Indepth discovery means financial recovery” and their civil award-winning accolades and their hundreds and hundreds of successful client financial recovery judgments speak volumes.


Motorcycle Defects

A motorcyclist has to assume responsibility for his or her motor bike with timely and scheduled maintenance. A poorly maintained bike is a accident looking for a place to happen. If not via an official manufacture recall, when there is found to be a problem in the mechanism of the motor bike, a wise biker will get that motor bike to a repair shop immediately. Unlike most automobiles that give the driver some warning and time for the driver to pull over and out of traffic, when a motorcyclist finally realizes there is a problem, he or she is usually airborne or struggling to keep the machine upright.


Motorcycle Maintenance Issues and Misrepresentation of Condition

Oddly, a bike rider can be ever so diligent in making certain to follow the scheduled maintenance charts as suggested bu the manufacturer and still he or she could experience a serious injury related to the maintenance of the bike. Even though the repair shop might be professionally operated and give the appearance of employing qualified mechanics, that is not always the case.

Do you have a legal question?
Enter your phone number below and let's talk.
--

Certified mechanics come with a price for their services and rather than pay what these employees are worth, some repair shops employ ‘shade tree’ mechanics instead. The repair shop owner might save on the front end by not paying top dollar for certified mechanics or technicians, but in the end everybody looses. The motorcyclists literally takes his life in his hands when he puts that motor bike on the road as a result of an untrained or uncertified worker performing repair work on a motorcycle. The repair shop owner stands to loose everything when a motorcycle accident or fatality occurs and there is a lawsuit. The untrained mechanic can be held liable also.

For a competent and veteran litigator, you need not look any further than Attorney Michael Grossman. He is a proven litigator with over twenty (20) years and hundreds and hundreds of courtroom successes and he is also known for his successful out-of-court negotiated skills. Call Grossman Law Offices toll-free at 1-855-338-0170. The initial legal consultation is at no cost to you. Our experienced litigators will listen as you explain your concerns and their response will be the result of over twenty (20) years of successful courtroom experience and financial recovery wins. Call us today.



Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases

$100,000.00 Recovery - Motorcycle Accident (Broken Femur)
(policy limits) Recovery for victim who sustained a broken femur in a motorcycle accident.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$33,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$100,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for passenger of Uninsured Driver Injured in Head-On Crash.
Total Recovery:
$100,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$40,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00
$200,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Closed Head Injury)
Recovered for car accident victim who suffered a closed head injury.
Total Recovery:
$200,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$66,666.00
Litigation Expenses:
$1,500.00
$250,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A young mother was killed in an accident involving two commercial vehicles, one an 18-wheeler. The accident occurred as the young woman was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down a highway in the early morning hours. Without warning, the vehicle in which she was a passenger collided with a stalled 18-wheeler that parked in the right of way, resulting in catastrophic injuries that claimed the young woman's life soon thereafter.

The authorities initially faulted the driver of the vehicle in which the victim was a passenger, stating that he was using an electronic device rather than paying full attention to the roadway. However, the 18-wheeler was indeed blocking the roadway and plaintiff alleged that the vehicle did not follow the requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act in regard to providing adequate reflective or laminated warning at specific intervals. Further, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant failed to remove his vehicle from the roadway when he first noticed signs of mechanical failure.

Had he simply moved to the shoulder of the road, plaintiffs argued, his lack of adequate warning signs would have been inconsequential. An initial settlement has been obtained in this case, yet litigation has commenced in full against the remaining defendant, and is currently ongoing.
Total Recovery:
$250,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$78,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$370.00
$25,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Soft-Tissue Injuries)
Recovery for the victim of a automobile accident.
Total Recovery:
$25,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$8,250.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$350,000.00 Recovery - Premises Liability (Brain Injury)
Our attorneys sued an apartment complex in relation to a brain injury sustained by a toddler when he fell through a balcony railing. The apartment complex denied liability, asserted that their railings were in spec at the time of the building's construction (some 20 years prior), and they claimed that the child's mother was contributorily negligent in that she did not notice that her child was playing near the railing.

Through litigation, our attorneys countered the defendant's arguments by showing that the case law does not support the notion of any safety related concerns in the building code being "grandfathered" in. On the contrary, a property owner has an obligation to keep safety features such as balcony railings within the specs at all times. The railings in this complex were spaced at 7 inch intervals, which was at odds with the now-standard 4 inch interval.

Additionally, our attorneys countered the claims of contributory negligence as a practical matter in that the mother was indeed monitoring the child's activity and the child literally ran up to the railing and immediately fell through the rails. Alternatively, we argued that the doctrine of parental immunity applied and that the contributory negligence, if any such negligence ever even occurred, of the mother would not be admissible. The case was satisfactorily resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$115,500.00
Litigation Expenses:
$5,000.00
$75,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Neck & Back Sprains)
(policy limits) Recovery for client who suffered sprains in the neck and back due to a rear-end car accident.
Total Recovery:
$75,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$21,277.00
Litigation Expenses:
$680.00
$1,150,000.00 Recovery - Automobile Accident (Brain Injury)
(policy limits) Recovery for a child who suffered an in utero brain injury as a result of a rollover car accident.
Total Recovery:
$1,150,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$379,500.00
Litigation Expenses:
$20,000.00
$1,000,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death/ Commercial Vehicle Accident
(policy limits) A husband and father of three was killed when the driver of an 18-wheeler veered into oncoming traffic, striking the young man's vehicle and several others. The defendant was employed by a small construction company that operated only a single 18-wheeler. As such, the defendants were largely underinsured and were not financially solvent.

Furthermore, the defendants had an eroding insurance policy and numerous other parties were intent upon filing claims of their own since the 18-wheeler struck multiple other vehicles. This created the need for an aggressive and rapid response before the other claimants could erode the policy.

Defense counsel made it clear that they wished to litigate the case despite the insurmountable liability arguments that our attorneys presented. They intended to designate a third party as a responsible defendant since the accident happened in a construction zone, even though it was abundantly clear that the construction zone played no role in the crash.

Additonally, the defendants made it clear that they wished to downplay the extent of the damages by virtue of a character assasination on the decedent. Fortunately for our clients, our firm has successfully litigated against the defendant's insurer in nearly a dozen cases, so the carrier was quite aware of our courtroom capabilities. We presented a sample lawsuit to the defendant's insurance carrier and informed them that the lawsuit was to be filed the moment that they refused to settle.

Additionally, our attorneys submitted a Stowers' Demand with a brief window of time for the defendants to respond. We made it abundantly clear that we intended to seek punitive damages and that we would assert the full limits of the carrier's exposure under the Stowers' Demand should the carrier not offer policy limits.

The defendant's attorney adamantly persuaded the carrier to litigate, however, our attorney's threats of litigation, past track record, and incredibly aggressive pre-litigation actions convinced the insurance carrier to disregard their own attorney's advice and to settle the case, lest they face our attorneys in court.

Had our clients been represented by virtually any other firm who did not have our specific track record or who would have not recognized that this case required special and immediate attention coupled with an abnormally aggressive stance, the client's would have certainly been tied up in litigation for years, with the limited supply of funds rapidly depleting since the other claimants who did not need to litigate would have essentially had right of first refusal.
Total Recovery:
$1,000,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$333,333.00
Litigation Expenses:
$0.00
$875,000.00 Recovery - Commercial Vehicle Accident (Back Injury Requiring Surgery)
Plaintiff suffered a back injury resulting in spinal fusion surgery when her car was rear-ended by an 18-wheeler. The defendants argued that the accident was unavoidable, thus denying liability. Litigation commenced and the case was satisfactorily resolved soon thereafter.
Total Recovery:
$875,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$288,750.00
Litigation Expenses:
$2,500.00